in

Dodgers: It’s 2022, Why Is MLB Still Allowing Bad Calls to Impact Postseason Games?

Let’s get this out of the way right off the top: The Dodgers should have scored more runs in the NLDS. They should have hit better with runners in scoring position. They had their chances, and they didn’t capitalize. The Padres outplayed the Dodgers, and that’s why the Padres won the series.

With that said, with the technology we have available today, why is MLB still allowing bad calls by the umpires to affect postseason games?

Umpires aren’t biased, as far as we know. But they are human, and pitchers throw harder than ever with more movement than ever. For that matter, catchers (aka, the things between the home-plate umpires and what they’re trying to see) are larger than ever, too.

The end result is that a lot of calls get missed. According to UmpScorecards.com, there were 40 missed ball/strike calls in the four-game NLDS, with a total “run impact” of 6.02. Run impact is measured by looking at a team’s run expectancy after the missed call and comparing it to the run expectancy if the call had been made correctly. So, for example, a missed call on a full-count with bases loaded and two outs would have a huge “run impact,” because it either incorrectly puts a run on the board and continues the inning or incorrectly takes a run off the board and ends the inning.

There were a total of 27 runs scored in the NLDS, with each game being decided by two runs or fewer. Are we okay with the umpires being responsible for 22% of the runs scored in a series? MLB apparently is.

Let’s look at the plate umps in the series. Game 2 ump Chris Segal had the 42nd-best accuracy rating of the 89 umpires with at least 10 games behind the plate this year. Mark Carlson (Game 3) was 46th.

There were a total of 20 potential Division Series games. Why would anyone ranked in the 40s even sniff one of those assignments? Because postseason umpiring assignments have no apparent relation to the quality of an umpire’s work. Doug Eddings is lined up to call balls and strikes in Game 6 of the NLCS; Eddings has been bad at his job since before Juan Soto was born, ranked 79th out of 89 this year. Game 3’s home plate ump, Ted Barrett, is two spots below Eddings on the list.

That’s one problem. The other problem is that even the best umpires are facing an impossible task. Jeremy Rehak was the best umpire in baseball this year, and he missed an average of seven calls a game. When one missed call has the potential to turn a series, are we really okay with a system where even the very best misses seven calls a game?

Can one missed call really turn a series, though? Let’s look back at that ill-fated seventh inning of NLDS Game 4. The first pitch Yency Almonte threw was a strike to Ha-Seong Kim. Tumpane thought differently and called it a ball. Two pitches later, on a 2-1 count with the infield drawn in, Kim chopped a double just past the glove of third baseman Max Muncy for an RBI double.

What if the count had been 1-2 instead of 2-1? Well, the infield wouldn’t have been drawn in, because the threat of the bunt would have been eliminated in the two-strike count. So the chopper just past Muncy’s glove is probably a chopper into Muncy’s glove, most likely for a double play. So instead of second and third, no outs, one run it, it would have been runner on second, two outs, no runs in. So yes, a bad call can turn a series.

Here’s the bottom line. We pay good money to watch baseball players play baseball. They’re the best in the world at what they do, and that’s why we care. The human element of baseball is a wonderful thing, when it’s coming from the players. I don’t need any human element in rules enforcement, thankyouverymuch. A taken pitch in the strike zone should be called a strike, and a taken pitch outside the strike zone should be called a ball. Period. End of story.

We have the technology to get those calls right, and it’s embarrassing that we continue to let bad calls sully the postseason.

11 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Agreed ‘framing’ is the biggest cheating mechanism in sports. Some people call it a skill, it is stealing strikes by using an illusion. I can’t wait for robo ump.

  2. The fact that Barrett is that low tells me the analytics are skewed. He is one of the best in the game. Players simply have to adjust to how an umpire calls a plate game. Same in basketball, and other sports. While I wish umpires would call more strikes, not less. Close or very close should be a strike, no matter what the silly TV box says. Guys can hit two inches off the plate.

    • Set the box how you want, then every at bat in every game is the same. Now that umpires stay set up on the outside corner for safety and don’t move their upper body to track the pitch in/out position they are handicapped on both sides of the plate. The alternative is bring back the air bladder chest protector and let umps work both sides of the plate.

  3. Jeff: You are absolutely right. Are there any stats from the minor leagues on automatic ball and strike calls yet? Do you envision a system where the umpire calls the balls and strikes but is overruled by the automatic zone projection? I thought that Muncy should have been able to make the play anyway on Kim’s double. Roberts apparently thought so also.

  4. You’re raising an issue that drives me crazy let me put it that way because otherwise this post would be banned. I have believed that electrical calls on strikes should be used over that last ten years. Hopefully, this is an issue they will discuss at the baseball winter meetings and get this problem fixed once and for all. Unless they like the idea of human error having a major impact on the game. If that is the case when it can be fixed, can anyone explain why they want human error to have that much impact on teams who work hard all year to get things right when they play the game just to let umpires spoil their hard work.

  5. Great article…..there is no excuse for continuing to allow these far too frequent missed/ wrong calls to negatively impact the outcome of each MLB game, especially when teams are pursuing the World Series ring! Why do they continue to disregard the usage of the technology available so they can provide the players and the fans with the accurate calls and outcomes we have longed for for many years!

  6. Muncy should have been playing closer to the line. It was the 7th, and you don’t play that far from the line in the 7th. He should have had that ball. And yes, there were many pitches that were called badly against the Dodgers in key innings.

  7. EXACTLY!!! I want games decided by players, not umpires. And I want the “playing field” (aka the strike zone) to be “level” for all hitters & pitchers – no more doubt, no more arguing, it is what it is (what the roboump says it is) and let’s move on!

Leave a comment ...