Editorials

Should the Dodgers Look to Trade Chris Taylor?

Since the Dodgers acquired him from the Seattle Mariners in a 2016 trade, Chris Taylor has been a linchpin for the team. He plays nearly every defensive position, fills in when other players are injured, and frequently offers manager Dave Roberts a late-game defensive upgrade off the bench.

Taylor’s versatility also allows president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman to be flexible when addressing roster needs. If the Dodgers lose an infielder to injury, Taylor can shift to the infield and Friedman can acquire the best available outfielder – or vice versa.



A fan favorite, Taylor has come through in some of the Dodgers’ biggest moments. His spectacular catch in left-center field in Game 7 of the 2018 NLCS preserved the Dodgers’ 2-1 lead over the Brewers. In 2021, Taylor’s late home run walked off the Cardinals in the wild card game, sending the Dodgers to their first-ever postseason series against the Giants.

Friedman rewarded Taylor for his production by signing him to a 4-year, $60 million contract in 2022. Now, it could be time to move on from the super utilityman as his opportunities for playing time shrink.

A Problem the Dodgers Created

As mentioned above, Taylor’s ultimate value comes from his ability to play everywhere. Recent acquisitions by the Dodgers, and other internal personnel moves, have changed the calculus for their positional needs.

With Mookie Betts shifting to second base, playing time in the infield goes down drastically. Even before the Dodgers signed Freddie Freeman, Taylor did not see much time at first base. Betts has played at least 140 games in the last two years, Freeman has played even more, reducing the need for a regular on the right side of the infield.

The projected starters on the left side of the infield are Gavin Lux and Max Muncy. In addition, last year Friedman traded for backup Miguel Rojas and extended his contract. Rojas performed admirably in Lux’s absence in 2023, giving the Dodgers one of baseball’s best defensive shortstops. With Lux returning, Rojas can resume roaming between shortstop and third base as a backup.

Moving to the outfield, we see a similar story. James Outman emerged as the everyday center fielder in 2023 with an impressive rookie campaign. Despite being platooned at times during the season, Outman logged 145 games in center. Friedman shored up right field by re-signing clubhouse leader Jason Heyward and trading for Manuel Margot.

Left field looks like Taylor’s for the taking, but historically the Dodgers have not played him at a single position every day. In 2022, he saw most of his time in left field, playing 80 games as part of a platoon with Trayce Thompson and Joey Gallo. Last year he played 57 games in left, again as part of a platoon with David Peralta.

If the Dodgers put Taylor in left field every day, that takes away the value of his versatility. Friedman has said he is looking to acquire an everyday left fielder who crushes left-handed pitching. Assuming he is successful, the Dodgers will owe Taylor $26 million over the next two years despite having few at-bats to offer him.

Possible Solutions

As evidenced by more than $1.1 billion in contractual obligations the Dodgers committed last month, money is not scarce. The Dodgers could keep Taylor, and his $15 million competitive balance tax hit, as a bench piece and a reliable substitution in case of injury. Even for the Dodgers though, that’s an expensive luxury.

Taylor could — and perhaps should — be the primary infield backup. “Backup” might not be the right word. With Lux returning from a knee injury that cost him all of 2023, it would be reasonable to bake some additional off-days into his schedule early in the season. Muncy, 33, will need days off too. A significant amount of playing time could be up for grabs in the infield.

I’d prefer Taylor take those plate appearances over Rojas. While he strikes out at an alarming rate, Taylor still provides streaks where he looks like the greatest hitter on the planet. He has an .805 career OPS in the postseason.

Rojas’ potential limits his ceiling to that of a defensive replacement. Despite his superlative glove at shortstop, Rojas (1.3 WAR) and Taylor (1.4) provided roughly equivalent value according to Baseball Reference, even though Rojas appeared in seven more games and had 39 additional plate appearances. Unlike Taylor, Rojas has never started a game in the outfield.

The Dodgers could trade Rojas for a low-level prospect. At $5 million, Rojas’ salary will not be prohibitive for most teams. This eases the tension of having two players on the roster in similar roles. It also frees up a valuable 40-man roster spot, something the Dodgers need to do anyway to sign a right-handed hitter.

The least attractive option would be to trade Taylor. The Dodgers might need to eat some of his remaining salary to line up 29 potential suitors, but several teams could justify taking on Taylor’s salary rather than overpaying a different right-handed utility player in a relatively weak group of free agents.

A trade could help Taylor find the consistent playing time he can’t be assured in Los Angeles. In return, the Dodgers could land a solid prospect. If he can shed all of Taylor’s contract, Friedman would even have more money to acquire another player or two, and keep the Dodgers’ payroll under the final luxury tax threshold.

Few outside the Dodgers’ front office know the plan for Taylor. Ideally, they can find a way to keep his bat in the lineup and move him around the field. Considering the depth of their roster, and the fact that Friedman is looking to add another right-handed bat, that’s easier said than done.

Photo Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Are you subscribed to our YouTube Channel? Subscribe and hit that notification bell to stay up to date on all the latest Dodgers news, rumors, interviews, livestreams, and more!

Kevin Skinner

Graduated from Creighton University with a degree in Biology and Philosophy. Despite growing up in San Diego, loves all thing Los Angeles sports

17 Comments

  1. Greatest hitter on the planet is a major reach. Never will he be anywhere near that. I don’t know why you threw that in there but, overall I wouldn’t be mad if we traded or kept him.

    1. If it is a salary dump for for luxury tax reasons then trade him. Throw him in with prospects for Beiber. Surely the Guardians can use players who can actually field and hit the occasional long ball. And maybe the “Jake” will be more to his liking as a hitter. Or you can move Margot and let Taylor be the utility outfielder, in addition to infielder. And if Lux re-injures his knee, God Forbid, then you have shortstop covered in a platoon with Rojas and Taylor and the other infield positions when Mookie or Max need days off. If the salary is really that big of deal then trading him is the best option, even if it is only for cash considerations if you have someone that will accept his contract even if you have to pay some of it. You need the 40 man roster flexibility.

    2. Taylor’s D is great but he strikes out more often than Dave Kingman
      Teoscar
      Soler
      I’d even sacrifice a little D and take on Eloy Jiménez in a Cease deal
      Make it a blockbuster and get Louie Bobby

      1. Exactly what I had said about the blockbuster move you mentioned. I did say Max but Eloy with Cease for asking price of prospects and Max or CT3 would just be insane.

  2. I love Taylor and would keep him in there. But a Stone and Taylor trade for Azorena I think the Rays would take that

    1. Stone n CT3 for Arozarena
      Friedman will do all day long
      Doesn’t necessarily have to be Stone. ( Loved when Stone debuted Dieter played Like a Stone) we have many pitchers Knack Grove …

  3. He is a good Dodger and veteran influence. But when he gets into one of his strike-out slumps he can certainly test a fans patience!! Keep him another year and get a manager who can smack his butt after he hits a couple of homer’s and starts swinging like he is home run king and strikes out when he should be putting ball in play like a. 280 hitter should!!!

  4. Trade Taylor AND Barnes for a Low-A prospect just to dump those two salaries

  5. Nobody is going to take Taylor and his salary. He is very valuable in his roll as a utility player — but only a utility player. The one player who should be rewarded with a trade is Michael Busch. The kid is probably losing millions by being stuck at AAA.

  6. Everything that is going on is great, and in the right direction, but how many times have we seen great teams put together and lose? No one talks about this in the big spender era, but please don’t forget, Jeter played with A-Rod half of his career, but only won 1 title together. He won 4 before he got there. Trout and Shohei, EVERY Mets team ever (not to mention some Laker teams and LeBron’s days with the Heat!)

    Spending does not translate to winning. Creating the right atmosphere/culture/vibe, that’s what does it. That being said, the #1 thing on their list right now should be resigning Kike to a 10 year deal, to stay on as a coach after he’s done playing, and retire @ 100 years old as the most winning player/coach in MLB history. Any player/former player can tell you how different it makes things to have a player like him on their team, and it kills me to see how it may be overlooked. Not only can he play any position, and has always produced for the team, but his presence is felt in every inning of every game he’s a part of. He is the most valuable player on the team, regardless of what his numbers are.

    To summarize, yes, PLEASE trade CT3, trade Vargas, trade Busch, Rojas, Margot, Heyward, Outman, Vesia, Yarbrough, Grove, Lux… whoever else you need to bundle, get another starter, and make a place for Kike… today… so that we’re able to win rings for the next 5-6-7-8 seasons. Otherwise investing all of this money could be for nothing.

  7. Keep him. The signing of Teoscar amplifies Taylor’s value. Now he’s not pigeon-holed into one position, allowing him to move around the diamond and fill-in for injuries and give others regular rest.

  8. No, I wouldn’t trade CT3. Yes, he has limitations, strikes out a lot, and has had a few injuries. That said, he’s a fan favorite, he has come through in the clutch numerous times, he’s obviously of great value due to his versatility and solid defense, and provides a nice chemistry with the team. The grass is always greener when considering other players to replace him, but how times have we seen that backfire? His value is proven and no need to dump him just to save salary – the team has plenty of deep pockets to retain him. Let’s see what some of you think when someone or multiple someones get hurt and there’s no Taylor to fill in. Find someone else to move off the roster if that’s a space requirement – just not Taylor…..PLEASE!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button